Legal
Powered by LawgixContract review queue
Contracts arrive from every team at once and all of them are urgent. The same non-standard clauses get missed under time pressure, and the review depends on who happens to read it.
Reviews get skipped or rushed exactly when the stakes are highest — at quarter end.
A working prototype with seeded data, built to show the shape of the workflow. It is not connected to a live system, and nothing you press sends anything to anyone.
Contracts awaiting review
4 items| Document | Counterparty | Risk |
|---|---|---|
Master services agreement Vendor onboarding · 24 pages | Larsen Systems | — |
Non-disclosure agreement Standard mutual · 4 pages | Ridhi Advisors | — |
Supply agreement Renewal · 31 pages | Orbit Components | — |
Consultancy contract New engagement · 11 pages | V. Iyer | — |
Seeded data · nothing is sent anywhere
- Contracts read in fullauto
Including scanned pages and annexures, not just the body text.
- Compared against your playbookauto
Your standard positions and fallbacks, applied consistently to every document.
- Deviations flagged with the clauseauto
Each flag cites the exact wording it objects to, so it can be checked in seconds.
- Redlines draftedauto
Written in your own fallback positions rather than generic legalese.
- Counsel decides what to acceptyou
Nothing is agreed, signed or sent back without a lawyer approving it.
Legal & contracts
What we would build for you
Contracts arrive from every team at once and all of them are urgent, so the review depends on who happens to read it and how tired they are. These builds run on Lawgix — our own legal AI platform, grounded in Indian Acts, rules and judgments — so instead of starting from scratch you get research, drafting and document intelligence on day one, with the workflows for your practice built on top.
Your version of this will look different.
Different queue, different rules, different place where a person steps in. Tell us how your team handles this today and we will tell you what we would automate — or that it is not worth automating yet.