AI automation & integration
The work your team repeats every week can run itself.
Bitvyas builds AI automation for small and mid-sized businesses — from the sales inbox to the GST return, and most of the work in between. We sit with your team, find what quietly eats the week, and automate it.
- WhatsApp assistants
- Website chatbots
- Invoice automation
- Lead qualification
- Appointment scheduling
- Document extraction
- CRM synchronisation
- Email triage
- Order processing
- Inventory alerts
- Review responses
- Meeting notes
- Proposal drafting
- Payment reminders
- Expense tracking
- Report generation
- Customer onboarding
- Support ticket routing
- Social media replies
- Contract review
- Survey analysis
- Lead scoring
- Follow-up sequences
- Slack & Teams bots
- Voice assistants
- PDF summarisation
- Multi-language support
- Quote generation
- Reconciliation
- Data entry
- GSTR-2B matching
- e-Invoice generation
- Resume screening
- Interview scheduling
- Purchase orders
- Vendor onboarding
- Attendance & leave
- Salary register prep
- Dispatch tracking
- Renewal reminders
What it costs today
You are already paying for this work. Just not in a line you can see.
Nobody budgets for retyping an address, chasing an approval or rebuilding the same report every Monday. It comes out of your team’s week instead — and out of the work you actually hired them to do.
23 hrs
a week lost to manual work
For a business of 5–50 people, that is roughly one and a half full-time salaries spent on work nobody chose to do.
Industry research, 2026
50–70%
is how far owners underestimate it
The cost hides in minutes — retyping an address, chasing an approval, rebuilding the same report. Nobody adds it up.
Industry research, 2026
24%
of monthly revenue can sit overdue
Not because customers refuse to pay, but because chasing them is nobody’s favourite job, so it happens late and unevenly.
Accounts receivable benchmarks
3.6%
of annual revenue goes to GST compliance
Reconciling purchases against GSTR-2B by hand, every month, to protect input credit you have already paid for.
MSME compliance study, Bengaluru
Published industry research, not our own measurements — your numbers will be different. Working out what they actually are is the first thing we do.
Where it hurts
Find your department. The complaint will sound familiar.
Starting with the departments we get asked about most. Open any one to see the work it takes off a team — yours will have its own quirks, which is what the first conversation is for.
Payroll runs, dispatch tracking, vendor onboarding, renewal reminders, stock alerts — the same approach applies wherever the pattern repeats.
See it running
Do not take our word for it. Press Run.
Pick any of these and watch the automated steps go, then see exactly where the work stops and waits for a person — because that is the honest shape of it, not a disclaimer we added later. Whatever we build for you behaves the same way.
Staying in control
Automation you can hand to your team without holding your breath.
The reason most owners hesitate is not whether it works. It is what happens the day it gets something wrong in front of a customer.
A person decides anything that matters
Every workflow we build names the steps that run by themselves and the steps that do not. Anything touching money, a customer relationship or a legal position waits for someone to approve it.
Nothing gets migrated
We connect to the CRM, sheets, accounting and messaging tools your team already opens every morning. No new system to learn, no data to move, no rollout that swallows a quarter.
Start with one workflow
Pick the job that costs you most and automate that alone. You judge us on something running in your business before deciding whether there should be a second one.
We will tell you when not to bother
Some work looks automatable and is not worth the effort. We would rather say so in the first conversation than build something that saves you twenty minutes a month.
How we work
From first conversation to something running.
We map the week
We sit with the people doing the work, not just whoever owns the software. What takes too long? What gets typed twice? Where do mistakes actually cost you?
We agree a scope
A written plan: what we will automate, what it connects to, where a person stays in control, and when you will see it running.
We build it
Weeks, not quarters. You see it working while it is being built and tell us what to change — directly, not through a ticket queue.
We keep it running
We deploy it, train your team, and stay on as the work changes. What you ask for next is what we build next.
Before you ask
The questions we get in every first conversation.
What will it get wrong?
It will misread things occasionally — every system does. That is exactly why the steps that carry risk are not automated. Reminders do not send, candidates are not rejected, contracts are not agreed and credit is not claimed until a person approves. The automation does the reading and the drafting; the judgement stays with your team.
Do we have to change the software we use?
No. We build on top of what you already run — your CRM, your accounting package, your spreadsheets, WhatsApp. If a tool has no modern way to connect, we work around it. The fastest automation is the one nobody has to be trained on.
How long does it take?
Weeks, not quarters. The first conversation maps where your week goes, then we scope one workflow in writing before anything is built. You see it working while it is being built rather than at a launch date.
What does it cost?
Quoted per engagement, agreed in writing before we start. You pay for the workflow we build, not for enterprise seat licences or a minimum number of users. We give you a figure after the scoping conversation, once we both know what is actually involved.
Is our data safe, and is it used to train anything?
Your data stays yours and is never used to train models shared with anyone else. Where work is sensitive — contracts, salaries, customer records — we scope access to only what the workflow needs.
We are twelve people. Are we too small?
No. Small teams usually have the clearest case, because one person is doing three jobs and the repetitive one is the easiest to hand over. If your team repeats it every week, it is probably worth automating.
Tell us what your team does twice.
One conversation, no obligation. Describe the work that repeats and we will come back with what we would automate, what it would connect to, how long it would take — or an honest answer that it is not worth automating yet.