Recruitment
Screening and scheduling desk
Applications arrive faster than anyone can read them. Each CV takes three to six minutes by hand, there is no consistent rubric between reviewers, and scheduling a single interview turns into a chain of emails.
Teams commonly lose strong candidates simply because the reply came a week late.
A working prototype with seeded data, built to show the shape of the workflow. It is not connected to a live system, and nothing you press sends anything to anyone.
Applications for “Sales Executive — Pune”
5 items| Candidate | Experience | Screen |
|---|---|---|
Ananya Deshpande B2B SaaS sales · Pune | 4 yrs | — |
Rahul Menon Field sales, FMCG · Mumbai | 6 yrs | — |
Priya Ramaswamy Inside sales · Bengaluru | 3 yrs | — |
Imran Qureshi Retail floor manager · Nagpur | 5 yrs | — |
Sneha Kulkarni Business development · Pune | 2 yrs | — |
Seeded data · nothing is sent anywhere
- Applications readauto
CVs parsed from PDF, DOCX and email bodies — including scans.
- Scored against your rubricauto
The same five must-haves applied to every candidate, in the same order.
- Ranked and reasons writtenauto
Every score carries the sentence that justifies it, so it can be argued with.
- Interview slots offeredauto
Shortlist gets your live calendar availability — no scheduling thread.
- You decide who to seeyou
Nothing is rejected or booked until a person confirms the shortlist.
Recruitment & HR
What we would build for you
A CV takes three to six minutes to read properly, which means a hundred applications is a lost day. So most get skimmed, or never opened, and the shortlist ends up being whoever applied first. We read all of them against the same five must-haves, rank them with the reason for each score written out, and offer your live calendar to the shortlist. Nobody is rejected by a machine — declines go out only when you approve them.
Your version of this will look different.
Different queue, different rules, different place where a person steps in. Tell us how your team handles this today and we will tell you what we would automate — or that it is not worth automating yet.